4.6 Article

Respiratory Movement of Upper Airway Tissue in Obstructive Sleep Apnea

期刊

SLEEP
卷 36, 期 7, 页码 1069-1076

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.5665/sleep.2812

关键词

Obstructive sleep apnea; dynamic imaging; respiratory movement; genioglossus; lateral walls

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Study Objectives: To measure real-time movement of the tongue and lateral upper airway tissues in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) subjects during wakefulness using tagged magnetic resonance imaging. Design: Comparison of the dynamic imaging of three groups of increasing severity OSA and a control group approximately matched for age and body mass index (BMI). Setting: Not-for-profit research institute Participants: 24 subjects (apnea hypopnea index [AHI] range 2-84 events/h, 6 with AHI < 5 events/h) Methods: The upper airway was imaged awake in two planes using SPAtial Modulation of Magnetization (SPAMM). Tissue displacements were quantified with harmonic phase analysis. Measurements and Results: All subjects had dynamic airway opening in the sagittal plane associated with inspiration. In the nasopharynx, the increase in airway cross-sectional area during inspiration correlated with minimal cross-sectional area of the airway (R = 0.900, P < 0.001). AHI correlated negatively with movement of the nasopharyngeal lateral walls ( R = - 0.542, P = 0.006). Four movement patterns were observed during inspiration: en bloc anterior movement of the whole posterior tongue; movement of only the oropharyngeal posterior tongue; bidirectional movement; or minimal movement. Some subjects showed different inspiratory movement patterns with different breaths. A low AHI (< 5) was associated with en bloc movement ( P = 0.002). Conclusions: Inspiratory movement of the tongue varied between and within subjects, likely as a result of local and neural factors. However, in severe OSA inspiratory movement was minimal.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据