4.6 Article

Trends in the Prevalence of Short Sleepers in the USA: 1975-2006

期刊

SLEEP
卷 33, 期 1, 页码 37-45

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/sleep/33.1.37

关键词

Time diary; short sleep; activity; work; secular trend

资金

  1. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [R01HL082907] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL082907, HL082907] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Study Objectives: To determine (1) whether short sleep has increased over 31 years; (2) whether trends in short sleep differed by employment status; (3) which sociodemographic factors predict short sleep; and (4) how short sleepers spend their time. Design: Time diaries from eight national studies conducted between 1975 and 2006. Patients or Participants: U.S. adults 18 years. Measurements and Results: Short sleepers were defined as those reporting < 6 hours of sleep in their time diary. Unadjusted percentages of short sleepers ranged from 7.6% in 1975 to 9.3% in 2006. The 1998-99 study had the highest odds of short sleep. The odds ratio for the 31-year period predicting short sleep was 1.14 (95% Cl: 0.92, 1.50, P = 0.22), adjusting forage, sex, education, employment, race, marital status, income, and day of week. When stratified by employment, there was a significant increase for full-time workers (P = 0.05), who represented over 50% of participants in all studies, and a significant decrease for students (P = 0.01), who represented < 5% of participants. The odds of short sleep were lower for women, those >= 65 years, Asians, Hispanics, and married people. The odds were higher for full-time workers, those with some college education, and African Americans. Short sleepers in all employment categories spent more time on personal activities. Short sleepers who were full- and part-time workers spent much more time working. Conclusions: Based on time diaries, the increase in the odds of short sleep over the past 31 years was significant among full-time workers only. Work hours are much longer for full-time workers sleeping < 6 hours.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据