4.6 Article

Sleep Duration and Cardiovascular Disease: Results from the National Health Interview Survey

期刊

SLEEP
卷 33, 期 8, 页码 1037-1042

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/sleep/33.8.1037

关键词

Sleep; sleep duration; cardiovascular disease; NHIS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Previous studies have shown that both short and long sleep durations are related to increased likelihood of diabetes and hypertension. However, the relation between sleep duration and cardiovascular disease (CVD) is not clear. We examined the hypothesis that compared with sleep duration of 7 hours, shorter and longer sleep durations are independently related to CVD. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of 30,397 National Health Interview Survey 2005 participants >= 18 years of age (57.1% women). Sleep duration was categorized as <= 5 hours, 6 hours, 7 hours, 8 hours, and >= 9 hours. The main outcome of interest was the presence of any CVD (n = 2146), including myocardial infarction, angina, and stroke. Results: We found both short and long sleep durations to be independently associated with CVD, independent of age, sex, race-ethnicity, smoking, alcohol intake, body mass index, physical activity, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and depression. Compared with a sleep duration of 7 h (referent), the multivariate odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of CVD was 2.20 (1.78, 2.71), 1.33 (1.13, 1.57), 1.23 (1.06, 1.41), and 1.57 (1.31, 1.89) for sleep duration <= 5 h, 6 h, 8 h, and >= 9 h. This association persisted in subgroup analyses by gender, race-ethnicity, and body mass index categories. Also, similar associations were observed when we examined myocardial infarction and stroke separately. Conclusion: Compared with sleep duration of 7 h, there was a positive association between both shorter and longer sleep durations and CVD in a representative sample of US adults. These results suggest that sleep duration may be an important marker of CVD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据