4.6 Article

EEG Spectral Analysis in Primary Insomnia: NREM Period Effects and Sex Differences

期刊

SLEEP
卷 31, 期 12, 页码 1673-1682

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/sleep/31.12.1673

关键词

Insomnia; non-rapid eye movement sleep; power spectral analysis; primary insomnia; sleep; electroencephalogram (EEG)

资金

  1. NIH [MH24652, AG00972, AG20677, RR00056, RR024153, MH30915]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Study Objectives: To compare NREM EEG power in primary insomnia (PI) and good sleeper controls (GSC), examining both sex and NREM period effects; to examine relationships between EEG power, clinical characteristics, and self-reports of sleep. Design: Overnight polysomnographic study. Setting: Sleep laboratory. Participants: PI (n = 48; 29 women) and GSC (n = 25; 15 women). Interventions: None. Measurements: EEG power from 1-50 Hz was computed for artifact-free sleep epochs across four NREM periods. Repeated measures mixed effect models contrasted differences between groups, EEG frequency bands, and NREM periods. EEG power-frequency curves were modeled using regressions with fixed knot splines. Results: Mixed models showed no significant group (PI vs. GSC) differences; marginal sex differences (delta and theta bands); significant differences across NREM periods; and group*sex and group*NREM period interactions, particularly in beta and gamma bands. Modeled power-frequency curves showed no group difference in whole-night NREM, but PI had higher power than GSC from 18-40 Hz in the first NREM period. Among women, PI had higher 16 to 44-Hz power than GSC in the first 3 NREM periods, and higher 3 to 5-Hz power across all NREM periods. PI and GSC men showed no consistent differences in EEG power. High-frequency EEG power was not related to clinical or subjective sleep ratings in PI. Conclusions: Women with PI, but not men, showed increased high-frequency and low-frequency EEG activity during NREM sleep compared to GSC, particularly in early NREM periods. Sex and NREM period may moderate quantitative EEG differences between PI and GSC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据