4.6 Review

Mixed-Mode Oscillations with Multiple Time Scales

期刊

SIAM REVIEW
卷 54, 期 2, 页码 211-288

出版社

SIAM PUBLICATIONS
DOI: 10.1137/100791233

关键词

mixed-mode oscillation; singular perturbation; dynamical system

资金

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/C54403X/1, EP/E032249/1]
  2. National Science Foundation
  3. Department of Energy
  4. Sydney University
  5. Center for Applied Mathematics (CAM) at Cornell University
  6. IGERT of CAM at Cornell University
  7. Cornell University
  8. University of Sydney
  9. Bristol Centre for Applied Nonlinear Mathematics
  10. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/C54403X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  11. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  12. Division Of Mathematical Sciences [1006272] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  13. Division Of Computer and Network Systems
  14. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [0832782] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mixed-mode oscillations (MMOs) are trajectories of a dynamical system in which there is an alternation between oscillations of distinct large and small amplitudes. MMOs have been observed and studied for over thirty years in chemical, physical, and biological systems. Few attempts have been made thus far to classify different patterns of MMOs, in contrast to the classification of the related phenomena of bursting oscillations. This paper gives a survey of different types of MMOs, concentrating its analysis on MMOs whose small-amplitude oscillations are produced by a local, multiple-time-scale mechanism. Recent work gives substantially improved insight into the mathematical properties of these mechanisms. In this survey, we unify diverse observations about MMOs and establish a systematic framework for studying their properties. Numerical methods for computing different types of invariant manifolds and their intersections are an important aspect of the analysis described in this paper.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据