4.6 Article

LOWER BOUND THEORY OF NONZERO ENTRIES IN SOLUTIONS OF l(2)-l(p) MINIMIZATION

期刊

SIAM JOURNAL ON SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING
卷 32, 期 5, 页码 2832-2852

出版社

SIAM PUBLICATIONS
DOI: 10.1137/090761471

关键词

variable selection; sparse solution; linear least-squares problem; l(p) regularization; smoothing approximation; first order condition; second order condition

资金

  1. Hong Kong Research Grants Council [PolyU5003/08P]
  2. national 973 project of China [2007CB311002]
  3. DOE [DE-SC0002009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently, variable selection and sparse reconstruction are solved by finding an optimal solution of a minimization model, where the objective function is the sum of a data-fitting term in l(2) norm and a regularization term in l(p) norm (0 < p < 1). Since it is a nonconvex model, most algorithms for solving the problem can provide only an approximate local optimal solution, where nonzero entries in the solution cannot be identified theoretically. In this paper, we establish lower bounds for the absolute value of nonzero entries in every local optimal solution of the model, which can be used to indentify zero entries precisely in any numerical solution. Therefore, we have developed a lower bound theorem to classify zero and nonzero entries in every local solution. These lower bounds clearly show the relationship between the sparsity of the solution and the choice of the regularization parameter and norm so that our theorem can be used for selecting desired model parameters and norms. Furthermore, we also develop error bounds for verifying the accuracy of numerical solutions of the l(2)-(p) minimization model. To demonstrate applications of our theory, we propose a hybrid orthogonal matching pursuit-smoothing gradient (OMP-SG) method for solving the nonconvex, non-Lipschitz continuous l(2)-l(p) minimization problem. Computational results show the effectiveness of the lower bounds for identifying nonzero entries in numerical solutions and the OMP-SG method for finding a high quality numerical solution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据