4.7 Article

Divergent biophysical controls of aquatic CO2 and CH4 in the World's two largest rivers

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 5, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/srep15614

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Research Council [ERC-StG 240002 AFRIVAL]
  2. Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique (FNRS, TransCongo) [14711103]
  3. Belgian Federal Science Policy (BELSPO, COBAFISH) [SD/AR/05A]
  4. Research Foundation Flanders (FWO-Vlaanderen)
  5. Research Council of the KU Leuven
  6. Fonds Leopold III pour l'Exploration et la Conservation de la Nature
  7. French National Research Agency [ANR 08-BLAN-0221 CARBAMA]
  8. Brazilian National Council of Research and Development [CNPq Universal 477655/2010-6]
  9. Hybam Observatory (INSU/IRD)
  10. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-08-BLAN-0221] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Carbon emissions to the atmosphere from inland waters are globally significant and mainly occur at tropical latitudes. However, processes controlling the intensity of CO2 and CH4 emissions from tropical inland waters remain poorly understood. Here, we report a data-set of concurrent measurements of the partial pressure of CO2 (pCO(2)) and dissolved CH4 concentrations in the Amazon (n = 136) and the Congo (n = 280) Rivers. The pCO(2) values in the Amazon mainstem were significantly higher than in the Congo, contrasting with CH4 concentrations that were higher in the Congo than in the Amazon. Large-scale patterns in pCO(2) across different lowland tropical basins can be apprehended with a relatively simple statistical model related to the extent of wetlands within the basin, showing that, in addition to non-flooded vegetation, wetlands also contribute to CO2 in river channels. On the other hand, dynamics of dissolved CH4 in river channels are less straightforward to predict, and are related to the way hydrology modulates the connectivity between wetlands and river channels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据