4.7 Article

Tailoring resistive switching in Pt/SrTiO3 junctions by stoichiometry control

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 5, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/srep11079

关键词

-

资金

  1. Air Force Office of Scientific Research under a MURI grant [FA9550-12-1-0038]
  2. FAME Center
  3. STARnet
  4. MARCO
  5. DARPA
  6. Elings Prize Fellowship of the California Nanosystems Institute at University of California, Santa Barbara
  7. NSF
  8. UCSB MRL
  9. MRSEC Program of the U.S. National Science Foundation [DMR-1121053]
  10. U.S. National Science Foundation through a Graduate Research Fellowship [DGE-1144085]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Resistive switching effects in transition metal oxide-based devices offer new opportunities for information storage and computing technologies. Although it is known that resistive switching is a defect-driven phenomenon, the precise mechanisms are still poorly understood owing to the difficulty of systematically controlling specific point defects. As a result, obtaining reliable and reproducible devices remains a major challenge for this technology. Here, we demonstrate control of resistive switching based on intentional manipulation of native point defects. Oxide molecular beam epitaxy is used to systematically investigate the effect of Ti/Sr stoichiometry on resistive switching in high-quality Pt/SrTiO3 junctions. We demonstrate resistive switching with improved state retention through the introduction of Ti- and Sr-excess into the near-interface region. More broadly, the results demonstrate the utility of high quality metal/oxide interfaces and explicit control over structural defects to improve control, uniformity, and reproducibility of resistive switching processes. Unintentional interfacial contamination layers, which are present if Schottky contacts are processed at low temperature, can easily dominate the resistive switching characteristics and complicate the interpretation if nonstoichiometry is also present.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据