4.6 Article

BURN TRAUMA INDUCES EARLY HMGB1 RELEASE IN PATIENTS: ITS CORRELATION WITH CYTOKINES

期刊

SHOCK
卷 33, 期 6, 页码 562-567

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/SHK.0b013e3181cd8c88

关键词

Burn injury; high-mobility group box protein 1; IL-6; IL-8; IL-10; inflammation; necrosis

资金

  1. Hungarian Scientific Research Fund [OTKA T060227, AOKA-34039-29/2009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High-mobility group box protein 1 (HMGB1) is a nuclear protein that may be released actively from monocytes and macrophages or passively from necrotic or damaged cells. Several experimental data suggest that burn injury is accompanied by elevated plasma HMGB, but there are only few data available about its changes in burned patients. The aim of this study was to follow the time course and the prognostic value of plasma HMGB1 and cytokine changes in patients with severe burn injury affecting more than 10% of body surface area (n = 26). Blood samples were taken on admission and on the following 5 days. Plasma HMGB1 concentration was measured by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method, whereas IL-6, IL-8, and IL-10 were assayed by the cytometric bead array kit. The HMGB1 and IL-10 concentrations were elevated on admission and gradually decreased thereafter. Significant differences were observed between survivors and nonsurvivors in HMGB1 (P < 0.01) and IL-10 (P < 0.001) concentrations on admission with higher levels in nonsurvivors. IL-6 and IL-8 started to increase markedly from day 2. Positive correlation (r = 0.669, P < 0.01) was found between burned body surface and HMGB1 on admission. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of data on admission showed that at a level of 16 ng/mL, HMGB1 indicated lethality, with 75.0% sensitivity and 85.7% specificity. Using the cutoff level of 14 pg/mL, IL-10 predicted intensive care unit mortality, with 85.7% sensitivity and 84.2% specificity. Very early HMGB1 and IL-10 release may have an important impact on the immune function of patients after burn trauma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据