4.6 Article

Depletion of NK cells in a murine polytrauma model is associated with improved outcome and a modulation of the inflammatory response

期刊

SHOCK
卷 30, 期 4, 页码 401-410

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/SHK.0b013e31816e2cda

关键词

sepsis; trauma; leukocytes; cytokines; apoptosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sepsis and associated diseases such as systemic inflammatory response syndrome and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome represent common posttraumatic complications on intensive care units induced by a variety of body defense mechanisms. Natural killer (NK) cells are part of the innate immune system. They are thought to play an important role in the development of such syndromes by interplay with other immune cell types and subsequent activation of the inflammatory cascade. To test this hypothesis, NK cells were depleted by administration of antimouse asialo-GM1 antibody in a murine polytrauma model consisting of femur fracture, hemorrhagic shock, and subsequent sepsis. Mortality and immune parameters such as cytokine expression in lung and liver, lymphocyte phenotyping, lymphocyte apoptosis, and organ pathology were determined 96 h after sepsis induction. Survival values showed 50% in the control sepsis group and 100% after NK cell depletion. Thus, NK cell depletion resulted in 50% mortality reduction. Furthermore, we found reductions in the inflammatory response, represented by IL-6 expression in liver, and a decrease in infiltrating neutrophils in the liver and lung. In addition, lymphocyte apoptosis in spleen was decreased by depletion of NK cells. Taken together, these data demonstrate that NK cells contribute to the pathogenetic pathways in a murine polytrauma model. One main mechanism of action seems to be the induction of systemic inflammatory events. Thus, depletion of NK cells results in attenuated inflammation and an overall improvement in outcome. Therefore, NK cells can be considered as important targets for therapeutic strategies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据