4.1 Article

Prevalence and Incidence of HPV Genital Infection in Women

期刊

SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES
卷 36, 期 11, 页码 696-703

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3181ad25ff

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: A prophylactic quadrivalent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine could benefit adult women if they are susceptible to incident genital HPV infections and are acquiring new infections with vaccine HPV types to which they were previously not exposed. This report presents baseline and prospective data from a randomized. double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of the quadrivalent HPV (Type 6/11/16/18) vaccine in women ages 24 to 45. Methods: We present the results of an epidemiologic analysis of 3730 women enrolled in a quadrivalent HPV vaccine efficacy trial between June 18, 2004 and April 30, 2008. Subjects were enrolled from 7 countries (Colombia, France, Germany, Philippines, Spain, Thailand.. and the United States) through community and academic health centers and primary health care providers. Results: Average baseline prevalence of anogenital infection and/or seropositivity was 32.8% for >= 1 vaccine HPV types and 0.3% for all vaccine HPV types. Incidence of anogential infection with any vaccine HPV type was similar to 10.5%. The rate of persistent infection was similar to 5% over a 30-month period among women in the placebo arm naive to the relevant type at baseline. Predictors of incident infection included younger age, marital status other than first marriage, higher number of lifetime and recent sex partners, and Chlamydia/gonorrhea infection at baseline. Conclusions: These findings indicate that women up to age 45 are susceptible to vaccine HPV types and some are acquiring anogenital infections with vaccine HPV types. Future study concerning incident and prevalent HPV infection among women up to age 45 is warranted (Trial NCT number NCT00090220).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据