4.7 Article

Genome-Wide Mining, Characterization, and Development of Microsatellite Markers in Gossypium Species

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 5, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/srep10638

关键词

-

资金

  1. Major State Basic Research Development Program of China (973 Program) [2011CB109300]
  2. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program) [2011AA10A102, 2012AA101108-04-04]
  3. National Key Technology Support Program [2015BAD02B00]
  4. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions
  5. 111 project [B08025]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although much research has been conducted to characterize microsatellites and develop markers, the distribution of microsatellites remains ambiguous and the use of microsatellite markers in genomic studies and marker-assisted selection is limited. To identify microsatellites for cotton research, we mined 100,290, 83,160, and 56,937 microsatellites with frequencies of 41.2, 49.1, and 74.8 microsatellites per Mb in the recently sequenced Gossypium species: G. hirsutum, G. arboreum, and G. raimondii, respectively. The distributions of microsatellites in their genomes were non-random and were positively and negatively correlated with genes and transposable elements, respectively. Of the 77,996 developed microsatellite markers, 65,498 were physically anchored to the 26 chromosomes of G. hirsutum with an average marker density of 34 markers per Mb. We confirmed 67,880 (87%) universal and 7,705 (9.9%) new genic microsatellite markers. The polymorphism was estimated in above three species by in silico PCR and validated with 505 markers in G. hirsutum. We further predicted 8,825 polymorphic microsatellite markers within G. hirsutum acc. TM-1 and G. barbadense cv. Hai7124. In our study, genome-wide mining and characterization of microsatellites, and marker development were very useful for the saturation of the allotetraploid genetic linkage map, genome evolution studies and comparative genome mapping.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据