4.4 Article

Synthesis and Evaluation of a Molecularly Imprinted Polymer for Solid Phase Extraction of Ethopabate from Chicken Tissue

期刊

SEPARATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 45, 期 3, 页码 404-412

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/01496390903409567

关键词

chicken tissue; ethopabate; molecularly imprinted polymer; solid phase extraction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper the development and evaluation of a molecularly imprinted polymer (MIP) for ethopabate is described. Ethopabate (ETP), 4-acetamido-2-ethoxybenzoic acid methyl ester, is one of the antibiotics which is used as coccidiostat in poultry feeds. In the present study, two widely used functional monomers, methacrylic acid (MAA) and 4-vinylpyridine (4-VP) were compared theoretically and experimentally as the candidates for MIP preparation. Hyperchem software was employed to estimate binding energies between ETP and functional monomers and batch rebinding experiments were performed to study the binding characteristics of the polymers. The results showed that MAA is a better functional monomer to prepare MIP. UV/Vis and NMR spectroscopy were used as two common tools to study the interactions between ETP and MAA in the pre-polymerization mixture. Liquid chromatography experiments showed that the prepared MIP has recognition capability toward ETP in comparison with other structurally related compounds. The ETP-imprinted polymer was further applied for selective solid phase extraction (SPE) of ETP from a chicken tissue sample. The extraction yield of ETP was found to be quantitative (87 +/- 3%) and the LOD and LOQ based on 3 and 10 times of the noise of HPLC profile were 0.05 and 0.32ngml-1, respectively. It was confirmed that the binding ability of the prepared MIP for ETP was essentially sufficient in the presence of other compounds coexisting in tissue sample. Therefore, as a selective and efficient solid phase material, ETP-imprinted polymer has a high potential application in the analysis of residues of this antibiotic in chicken tissue samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据