4.4 Article

Purification of Produced Water by Ceramic Membranes: Material Screening, Process Design and Economics

期刊

SEPARATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 44, 期 15, 页码 3455-3484

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/01496390903253395

关键词

Beneficial use; inorganic membranes; produced water; purification; reverse osmosis

资金

  1. Department of Finance and Administration (DFA'') of New Mexico [MOU 7884]
  2. US Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory [DE-FC26-04NT15548]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Produced water, generated from underlying formations during the recovery of hydrocarbons, constitutes the largest waste stream associated with oil and gas production. Currently, over 90% of produced water is reinjected into the formation, either in support of enhanced oil recovery or for disposal. In arid areas, reclamation of produced water for beneficial uses such as irrigation or tower cooling may be an attractive alternative if the produced water can be purified to an adequate quality, specifically through the removal of dissolved components including inorganic compounds (salts, heavy metals, and radiochemicals) and organic compounds (fatty acid, aliphatic, and aromatics). Membranes technologies show advantages in both energy efficiency and high water quality. Due to the presence of dissolved organics, reverse osmosis with organic membranes is highly limited. Research efforts focus on developing new materials that are less prone to fouling and are easy to regenerate. Novel ceramic membranes are relatively new classes of material that show promising application in produced water purification due to their extreme stability in harsh environments and optional choices for regeneration. This paper details the results of investigations of produced water purification by microporous ceramic membranes, including metal oxide membranes, clay membranes, and zeolite membranes. Techniques for membrane fabrication, process design, and economic aspects are also discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据