4.7 Article

Cake formation and particle rejection in microfiltration of binary mixtures of particles with two different sizes

期刊

SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY
卷 123, 期 -, 页码 214-220

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2013.12.033

关键词

Binary mixtures; Cake filtration; Filtration rate; Particle rejection; Pore blocking

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan
  2. Ministry of the Environment, Japan
  3. Steel Foundation for Environmental Protection Technology
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24656467, 25420800] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The filtration behaviors were examined in microfiltration of binary mixtures of particles with two different sizes. Dilute suspension of monodisperse polystyrene latexes with particle diameters of 0.522 and 0.091 mu m was filtered using the microfiltration membranes with the nominal pore size of 0.3 mu m, making them essentially impermeable to larger particles but permeable to smaller particles. The filter cake comprised of larger particles alone initially formed because smaller particles permeate through the membrane. However, the flux decline became gradually marked since smaller particles were trapped into the pores of the filter cake of larger particles. Eventually, smaller particles were fully rejected, and thereafter the binary cake of both larger and smaller particles grew. This filtration behavior was reflected by both data of flux decline and particle rejection. The logistic equation was employed to describe the variation of the rejection of smaller particles with the progress of filtration. The flux decline behaviors were well described using the logistic equation on the basis of the resistance-in-series model that the total cake resistance was represented by adding the increased cake resistance caused by the capture of smaller particles to the cake resistance of larger particles alone. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据