4.7 Article

Potential of ultrafiltration for separation and purification of ellagitannins in blackberry (Rubus adenotrichus Schltdl.) juice

期刊

SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY
卷 125, 期 -, 页码 120-125

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2014.01.037

关键词

Ultrafiltration; Fractionation; Blackberry; Ellagitannins; Anthocyanins

资金

  1. PAVUC-FP6-INCO project DEV-2 [015279]
  2. MICIT/CONICIT (Costa Rican Government)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tropical highland blackberry is characterized by its high content of ellagitannins, which are considered to be potentially beneficial for human health, but relatively rare in food sources. Due to its relatively high molecular weight, the feasibility of selective separation of ellagitannins by ultrafiltration was assessed on clarified tropical highland blackberry juice. Six organic tight ultrafiltration membranes with nominal molecular weight cut-off (MWCO) ranging from 1 to 150 kDa were tested. Filtration temperature was set constant to 30 degrees C, cross-flow velocity to 0.3 m s(-1) and transmembrane pressures varied at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2 and 3 MPa, for each membrane tested. Experiments were performed at a constant volumetric reduction ratio (1 < VRR < 1.1) and quantitative analyses of total ellagitannins and anthocyanins were determined by HPLC/DAD. Retention of ellagitannins reached 100% for all membranes except for that showing a nominal MWCO of 150 kDa, when transmembrane pressure was over 1 MPa. Retention of total anthocyanins increased with transmembrane pressure and reached values over 90% for all membranes tested at 3 MPa. A membrane with a nominal MWCO of 2 kDa presented the highest anthocyanin flux at 2 MPa and thus appeared to be the most promising for fractionation of the polyphenolic compounds. A model used to predict total ellagitannin purification with constant volume diafiltration confirmed that this membrane presented one of the lowest diavolumes needed to achieve a purity of 90% at higher transmembrane pressures. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据