4.7 Article

Micelle size characterization of lipopeptides produced by B. subtilis and their recovery by the two-step ultrafiltration process

期刊

SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY
卷 104, 期 -, 页码 175-182

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2012.11.017

关键词

Ultrafiltration; Membrane purification; Lipopeptide; B. subtilis; Micelles

资金

  1. Universite Lille 1, Sciences et Technologies
  2. FEDER funds (ARCIR) from the Region Nord-Pas-de-Calais
  3. French Ministere de l'Enseignement et de la Recherche, EGIDE
  4. British Council as part of the Partenariat Hubert Curien Alliance [19406WE]
  5. European INTERREG IV PhytoBio project

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this work was to investigate the lipopeptides aggregation behavior in single and mixed solutions in a wide range of concentrations, in order to optimize their separation and purification following the two-step ultrafiltration process and using large pore size membranes (up to MWCO = 300 kDa). Micelle size was determined by dynamic light scattering. In single solutions of lipopeptide both surfactin and mycosubtilin formed micelles of different size depending on their concentration, micelles of average diameter = 5-105 nm for surfactin and 8-18 nm for mycosubtilin. However when the lipopeptides were in the same solution they formed mixed micelles of different size (d = 8 nm) and probably conformation to that formed by the individual lipopeptide, this prevents their separation according to size. These lipopeptides were purified from fermentation culture by the two-step ultrafiltration process using different MWCO membranes ranging from 10 to 300 kDa. This led to their effective rejection in the first ultrafiltration step by membranes with MCWO = 10-100 kDa but poor rejection by the 300 KDa membrane. The lipopeptides were recovered at 90% purity (in relation to protein) and with 2.34 enrichment in the permeate of the second ultrafiltration step with the 100 KDa membrane upon addition of 75% ethanol. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据