4.7 Article

Oxidative removal of bisphenol A by permanganate: Kinetics, pathways and influences of co-existing chemicals

期刊

SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY
卷 107, 期 -, 页码 48-53

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2013.01.023

关键词

Permanganate; Endocrine disrupting chemicals; Oxidation products; Mineralization; Water treatment

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21077029]
  2. Foundation of the State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, China [PCRRY11001]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [0040219206]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Batch experiments were carried out to investigate the decomposition of bisphenol A (BPA) by permanganate. Permanganate (100 mu M) was very effective for BPA degradation and over 99% BPA (5 mu M) was eliminated in 15 min at pH 7.0. A parabola-like shaped pH-rate profile for BPA oxidation by aqueous permanganate was found over the pH range of 4.0-11.0. The rate constants of permanganate reaction with BPA were strongly dependent on temperature and the activation energy was determined to be 67.8 kJ mol(-1). Eleven degradation intermediates were observed by LC-MS/MS and the pathways of BPA degradation by permanganate were proposed. The intermediates generated in the processes of BPA oxidation by permanganate, ferrate, ozone, chlorine or hydroxyl radical indicated that benzoic ring was the reaction site at the early stage of BPA oxidation by various oxidants. The presence of humic acid (HA), HCO3-, Fe2+ and Fe3+ at their environmentally relevant concentrations enhanced BPA removal following the order: HA > HCO3- > Fe2+> Fe3+. BPA degradation in tap water, river water, and synthetic water at pH 7.0 was faster than that in deionized water, indicating that permanganate was selective for BPA oxidation. These results suggested that permanganate oxidation is an effective method for the purification of waters containing phenolic EDCs. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据