4.7 Article

Effect of different additives on the physical and chemical CO2 absorption in polyetherimide hollow fiber membrane contactor system

期刊

SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY
卷 98, 期 -, 页码 472-480

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2012.06.033

关键词

Polyetherimide; Hollow fiber membrane contactor; CO2 capture; Additives

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Porous asymmetric polyetherimide (PEI) hollow fiber membranes were fabricated via a phase-inversion method using ethanol, glycerol and acetone as the additives in the spinning dope. Also, hollow fiber PEI membrane without additives was fabricated. An aqueous solution of 1-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (80 wt.%) was used as bore fluid to prevent forming of an inner dense skin layer. The precipitation rate of the polymer dopes with the different additives was studied using cloud point measurement. The effect of the additives on the resulting membrane structure, surface porosity, pore size, critical water entry pressure, collapsing pressure and physical and chemical CO2 absorption performance by distilled water and NaOH (1 M) solution in a gas liquid membrane contactor system were investigated and compared. Cloud point diagrams indicated that the precipitation rate of the polymer dopes increased following the trend of ethanol > acetone > glycerol. Results of gas permeation tests showed that ethanol and glycerol as additives provided the membranes with the largest and smallest pore size, respectively. Moreover, all the additives resulted in an increase in the effective surface porosity. The cross-section of the membranes was examined via a scanning electron microscopy. Ethanol in the spinning dope provided the membrane structure with a sublayer with finger-like macrovoids, originating from the inner and outer surfaces of the hollow fiber and extending to the middle section of the hollow fiber wall, which resulted in a larger pore size and higher CO2 absorption rate than the other PEI hollow fiber membranes. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据