4.7 Article

Removal of bisphenol A and 17β-estradiol in single walled carbon nanotubes-ultrafiltration (SWNTs-UF) membrane systems

期刊

SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY
卷 90, 期 -, 页码 39-52

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2012.02.007

关键词

Bisphenol A; 17 beta-Estradiol; Ultrafiltration; Single walled carbon nanotubes; Adsorption; Retention

资金

  1. GS EC
  2. Korea Ministry of Environment
  3. Korea Ministry of Environment [414-111-004]
  4. Korea Environmental Industry & Technology Institute (KEITI) [414-111-004] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The retention and adsorption of bisphenol A (BPA) and 17 beta-estradiol (E2) were examined using three commercially available ultrafiltration (UF) membranes. A stirred cell operated within a batch dead-end stirred cell was employed to study the solute retention and the membrane flux of solutions both in the absence and presence of natural organic matter (NOM) and single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs). The batch adsorption and stirred-cell filtration experiments indicated that adsorption was an important mechanism for the retention of hydrophobic compounds and was dependent on the octanol-water partition coefficient. The results also suggested that BRA and E2 transport was influenced by NOM, which fouls the membrane through pore blockage and cake/gel formation. The NOM fouling was presumably attributed to the adsorptive hydrophobic interactions, which decreased the membrane pore size and caused the flux decline. A strong linear correlation between the retention and adsorption of BPA and E2 was observed, indicating that retention by the UF membranes was mainly due to the adsorption of BPA and E2 onto the membrane, the SWNTs, and/or the NOM. Size-exclusion is unlikely to be a key factor in the retention of E2, however, BRA retention showed a slight dependence on the membrane pore size. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据