4.7 Article

Removal of hexavalent chromium by electrochemical reduction-precipitation: Investigation of process performance and reaction stoichiometry

期刊

SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY
卷 76, 期 3, 页码 345-350

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2010.11.002

关键词

Cr(VI) reduction; Cr(VI) adsorption; Precipitation; Current efficiency; Electrode deposit

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work experimentally investigates aqueous Cr(VI) reduction/removal by electrotreatment with mild steel electrode in a batch stirred reactor. Cr(VI) removal is due to simultaneous reduction to Cr(III) followed by precipitation and adsorption of Cr(VI) on Fe(OH)(3)(s)/Cr(OH)(3)(s) sludge formed. Cr(VI) adsorbed on sludge increases to maximum 10% and decreases to negligible level with diminishing concentration of Cr(VI) in solution. Concentration of Cr(VI) can be decreased to its discharge limit (0.5 mg/l) in a single process step without addition of any precipitating agent. The highest reduction rate of Cr(VI) was found to be 3.8 mgl(-1) min(-1) at lowest initial pH 2 at the beginning (treatment time <1 min) of the run, but Cr(III) in solution remains high due to its high solubility. The Cr(VI) reduction rate varies between 1.38 and 0.89 mgl(-1) min(-1) at higher initial pH (4.9-10). Among the anions Cl-, NO3-, SO42- and PO43-, PO43- is found to inhibit Cr(VI) reduction significantly by around 27% as it enhances oxidation of Fe(II) by dissolved oxygen. Stoichiometry of Cr(VI) reduction was experimentally determined at lower pH (2-3.1) range, where oxidation of Fe(11) by dissolved oxygen and its precipitation can be neglected. Against stoichiometric ratio of similar to 3 in case of reduction of Cr(VI) by Fe(II), the observed overall molar ratio varies from 2.49 to 2.92. Participation of Fe-0 on the electrode surface(s) in reducing Cr(VI) and accumulation of deposit on electrodes explain the observations including progressive variation. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据