4.7 Article

Performance and mechanism of simultaneous removal of chromium and arsenate by Fe(II) from contaminated groundwater

期刊

SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY
卷 80, 期 1, 页码 179-185

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2011.04.034

关键词

Chromate; Arsenate; Ferrous iron; Reduction; Co-precipitation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50908060, 50821002]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology [2010TS10]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The feasibility and the mechanisms of simultaneous removal of chromium and arsenate by Fe(II) were investigated. In the absence of arsenate, chromium removal by Fe(II) increased to the maximum with increasing pH from similar to 4 to similar to 7 and then decreased with further increase in pH. Chromium removal by Fe(II) was controlled by the rate of Cr(VI) reduction by Fe(II) and the solubility of Fe(0.75)Cr(0.25)(OH)(3) at pH <= 7, but by the extent of Cr(VI) reduction under alkaline conditions. The presence of arsenate resulted in a decrease in chromium removal by Fe(II) under neutral and alkaline conditions as a result of the depression in the magnitude of Cr(VI) reduction by Fe(II) and sequestration of the Fe(0.75)Cr(0.25)(OH)(3) and FeOOH precipitation by HAsO(4)(2-). Arsenate removal by Fe(II) alone was trivial but was improved significantly at pH 4-9 due to the presence of 10-30 mu mol L(-1) chromate. It was the oxidative property of chromate that resulted in the oxidization of Fe(II) to Fe(III) concomitantly facilitating the removal of arsenate. Arsenate was removed by both adsorption and co-precipitation with Fe(0.75)Cr(0.25)(OH)(3) and FeOOH precipitates. EXAFS results revealed that arsenate mainly coordinated with Fe(III) rather than Cr(III) and arsenate formed bidentate-binuclear complexes with FeO(OH) octahydra as evidenced by an average Fe-As(V) bond distance of 3.25-3.26 angstrom. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据