4.7 Article

Synergistic extraction and separation of valuable metals from waste cathodic material of lithium ion batteries using Cyanex272 and PC-88A

期刊

SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY
卷 78, 期 3, 页码 345-351

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2010.12.024

关键词

Waste cathodic materials; Valuable metals; Synergistic extraction; Cyanex272; PC-88A

资金

  1. State Major Basic Research Development Program of China [2007CB613507]
  2. Young Scientific Foundation in the Key Laboratory of Green Process and Engineering, Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Synergistic extraction and separation of cobalt (II), manganese (II) and lithium (I) from simulated sulfuric acid leaching of waste cathodic materials, using mixture of bis(2,4,4-trimethylpentyl) phosphinic acid (Cyanex272, HA) and 2-ethylhexyl phosphinic acid mono-2-ethylhexyl ester (PC-88A, HL) in n-heptane have been investigated. Extraction of Co(2+), Mn(2+) and Li(+) follows the order as: Mn > Co >> Li independent on taking the single Cyanex272 or PC-88A or their mixtures as extractants. The possible extracted species are MA(2).3HA or M(OH)A.3HA for single extractant (PC-88A and Cyanex272 are same) and MH(3)A(2)L(3) for the mixed-extractant (M(2+) is Co(2+) or Mn(2+)). Cyanex272 + PC-88A shows an evident synergistic effect. The maximum synergistic enhancement coefficients, R(max), are obtained for Co(2+) (3.48) and Mn(2+) (4.12) at the mole fraction X(cyanex272) around 0.6 at pH(e) 4.95. Furthermore, the separation factors (Mn/Co) have been improved around two orders of magnitude upon adding EDTA into the synergistic extraction system. The entire stripping of Co and Mn can be achieved in one single stage when the concentration of hydrochloric acid or sulfuric acid is larger than 0.04 M or 0.01 M, respectively. Finally, a feasible process for recycling of spent cathodic materials of LIBs was proposed with industrial applications prospects. 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据