4.7 Article

Anomalous Henry's law behavior of nitrogen and carbon dioxide adsorption on alkali-exchanged chabazite zeolites

期刊

SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY
卷 67, 期 3, 页码 336-343

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2009.03.045

关键词

Chabazite; Zeolite; Henry's law; Adsorption equilibrium; Carbon dioxide

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work presents adsorption equilibria of N-2 and CO2 on a fully exchanged potassium chabazite (KCHA), sodium chabazite (NaCHA) and lithium chabazite (LiCHA) zeolites. Isotherms were measured at 273, 303 and 333 K over pressure ranges from 0.1 to 103 kPa for N-2 and from 0.001 to 103 kPa for CO2, using a volumetric apparatus. In all cases, CO2 adsorption capacities were remarkably higher than those for N-2 with unusual non-linear isotherm trends at pressures lower than 1.0 kPa. Accordingly, extrapolation to zero pressure for the determination of Henry's constants is problematic and could be erroneous. The maximum loadings of N-2 and CO2 were obtained on LiCHA, and very low loadings of N-2 on KCHA (attributed to pore blockage) suggest KCHA is a promising adsorbent for N-2/CO2 mixture separation. The adsorbed phase density of CO2 on LiCHA was found to be fairly consistent with the theoretical value derived from van der Waals equation, while densities on NaCHA and KCHA deviated significantly from van der Waals' values. This discrepancy was attributed to the underestimation of pore volumes in NaCHA and KCHA obtained from N-2 isotherms at 77 K. Henry's law constants were extracted from virial plots for the measured isotherms. The virial plots for CO2 isotherms on KCHA and NaCHA exhibit negative-slope profiles at 273 K and pressures lower than about 1.0 kPa. The temperature dependence of the Henry's law constants obtained from the virial plots indicates that at these conditions we do not have a true equilibrium condition. Rather, we suggest that kinetic hindrance dominated CO2 adsorption at the low coverage region partially due to pore blockage. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据