4.6 Article

Application of Multi-Barrier Membrane Filtration Technologies to Reclaim Municipal Wastewater for Industrial Use

期刊

SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION REVIEWS
卷 43, 期 4, 页码 263-310

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15422119.2012.758638

关键词

Membrane filtration; municipal wastewater reclamation; industrial water quality; ultrafiltration; reverse osmosis

资金

  1. Regional Government of Madrid (Comunidad Autonoma de Madrid), Spain [S-0505/AMB-0100]
  2. Ministry of Science and Innovation of Spain (Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion) [CTM2008-06886-C02-01]
  3. European Union [211534]
  4. Regional Government of Madrid (Comunidad Autonoma de Madrid), Spain [S-0505/AMB-0100]
  5. Ministry of Science and Innovation of Spain (Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion) [CTM2008-06886-C02-01]
  6. European Union [211534]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The significant percentage of the world water consumption devoted to industrial use, along with an increasingly higher environmental concern of society, has awaken the interest of industry on using municipal reclaimed water for replacing fresh water use coming from utilities or natural resources. Depending on the type of industry and the specific application, water must meet certain quality requirements. Therefore, those water quality standards that are required for those most relevant industrial applications wherein the use of reclaimed water has noticeably been reported are herewith reviewed. Although the use of internal water treatments for recycling and reusing their own effluents has recently and widely been reported within many industrial sectors worldwide, the substitution of fresh water by reclaimed municipal wastewater has yet to be extended much. The increasing proportion of municipal wastewater reclamation plants that rely on membrane filtration technologies versus the total number of reclamation facilities that are distributed worldwide is also assessed within this review, including the discussion of their main related drawbacks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据