4.7 Article

A ratiometric fluorescent chemosensor for Cr3+ based on mono mer-excimer conversion of a pyrene compound

期刊

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
卷 203, 期 -, 页码 712-718

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2014.07.046

关键词

Chemosensor; Ratiometric; Pyrene; Excimer; Cr3+

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21005068]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2014M552140]
  3. Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [11JJ3023, 13JJ6039, 12JJ7002]
  4. Scientific and Technological Plan Project of Hunan Province [2012FJ4304]
  5. Key Laboratory of Environmentally Friendly Chemistry and Applications of Ministry of Education [10HJYH08]
  6. Hunan Provincial Education Department [11C1204, 12C0393]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A pyrene compound (1) containing piperazine was synthesized and used as ratiometric fluorescent chemosensor to recognize Cr3+. The ratiometric fluorescent signal change of the chemosensor is on the basis of monomer-excimer conversion of 1 induced by Cr3+. As far as we know, it is the first ratiometric chemosensor based on pyrene that is developed for Cr3+. The analytical performance characteristics of the proposed Cr3+-sensitive chemosensor were investigated. The chemosensor can be applied to the quantification of Cr3+ with a linear range covering from 2.0 x 10(-7) to 1.0 x 10(-5) M with the detection limit is 4 x 10(-8) M. The experiment results show that the response behavior of 1 towards Cr3+ is pH independent in medium condition (pH 6.0-8.0). Most importantly, the fluorescence changes of the chemosensor are remarkably specific for Cr3+ in the presence of other metal ions, which meet the selective requirements for practical application. Moreover, the response of the chemosensor toward Cr3+ is fast (response time less than 2 min). In addition, the chemosensor has been used for determination of Cr3+ in real sample such as river and pond water with satisfactory results. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据