4.7 Article

Selective and sensitive colorimetric sensor of mercury (II) based on gold nanoparticles and 4-mercaptophenylboronic acid

期刊

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
卷 196, 期 -, 页码 106-111

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2014.01.060

关键词

Colorimetric sensor; Gold nanoparticles; Mercury ion; 4-Mercaptophenylboronic acid; Anti-aggregation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21105062, 21175091, 21202095]
  2. Foundation for University Young Key Teacher of Henan Province [2013GGJS-162]
  3. Innovation Scientists and Technicians Troop Construction Projects of Henan Province
  4. Program for Innovative Research Team (in Science and Technology) in University of Henan Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A simple and rapid colorimetric sensor for Hg2+ in aqueous solution was developed based on the observation that the detection target, Hg2+, could inhibit the aggregation of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) induced by 4-mercaptophenylboronic acid (MPBA). Without a potent competitor, MPBA can bind to the AuNPs via Au-S bonds and induces the aggregation of AuNPs by self-dehydration condensation of boronic acid groups, resulting in a visible color change of the AuNPs solution from red to blue. In the presence of Hg2+, the thiol group of MPBA preferentially binds to Hg2+ and thus MPBA loses the ability to induce aggregation of AuNPs, which is mechanism behind the color change of the solution from blue to red. Our results showed that the absorbance ratio (A(520)/A(690)) was linear with the Hg2+ concentration in the range of 0.01-5 mu M (R = 0.998). The detection limit of the colorimetric sensor was 8 nM (S/N = 3). The colorimetric changes of the sensor were extremely specific for Hg2+ and no obvious color change was observed when adding other competitive metal ions in parallel. Further promising results from Hg2+ detection in water samples indicated that our newly developed assay might open a new assay avenue for Hg2+ determination. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据