4.7 Article

Graphene quantum dots as a fluorescent sensing platform for highly efficient detection of copper(II) ions

期刊

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
卷 190, 期 -, 页码 516-522

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2013.09.009

关键词

Graphene quantum dots; Cu(II) ions; Detection; Fluorescence; Quenching

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21103092]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [30920130111003]
  3. Qing Lan Project
  4. Science and Technology Support Plan of Jiangsu Province [BE2011835, BE2013126]
  5. Excellent Plan Foundation of NUST
  6. Department of Education of Jiangsu Province
  7. [NCET-12-0629]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Graphene quantum dots (GQDs) have been attractive due to their optical properties with the change of the size. The stable blue fluorescent GQDs are prepared via the hydrothermal method using reoxidized graphene oxide. Based on the quenching of as-prepared GQDs fluorescence by Cu(II) in water, a facile and direct fluorescence sensor for the detection of Cu2+ ions has been studied. It exhibits an extraordinarily high sensitivity and selectivity to Cu2+ ions compared to other metal ions in aqueous solution. The fluorescence intensity is inversely proportional to the concentration of Cu2+ ions, and the calibration curve displays linear regions over the range of 0-15 mu M, with a detection limit of 0.226 mu M. These results indicate that GQDs, as a fluorescent sensing platform, could meet the selective requirements for biomedical and environmental application and be sensitive enough to detect Cu2+ ions in environmental water samples, even in drinking water, which has a limit of 20 mu M defined by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The possible mechanism of Cu(II)-induced fluorescence quenching of GQDs was also discussed. The fluorescence lifetime experimental result demonstrates that the quenching mechanism appears to be predominantly of the static (rather than dynamic) type. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据