4.7 Article

A practical carbon dioxide gas sensor using room-temperature hydrogen plasma reduced graphene oxide

期刊

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
卷 193, 期 -, 页码 692-700

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2013.12.017

关键词

Reduced graphene oxide; Hydrogen plasma; Carbon dioxide gas sensor

资金

  1. High Impact Research Grant by Ministry of Higher Education of Malaysia [UM.C/625/1/HIR/MOHE/SC/06]
  2. Flagship Project [FL017-2011]
  3. University of Malaya [RPOO7C/13AFR]
  4. MOHE [ER008-2012A]
  5. Science fund [01-03-04-5F0027]
  6. Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MOSTI)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report on the development of a carbon dioxide gas sensor from the room-temperature reduction of graphene oxide via hydrogen plasma. The hydrogen plasma contains radicals and atoms which give dissociation energies for oxygen functional groups, which is capable of reducing the graphene oxide. The sample morphology, degree of reduction, chemical bonding and gas sensing capability were systematically studied. The effective removal of oxygen functional groups at the edges and both basal planes while restoring C=C bonds has been observed by AFM, XPS and Raman analysis. The C/O ratio increased from 0.81 to 7.9 and the resistance decreased significantly from 33k Omega to 1.6k Omega after the reduction process. The fabricated rGO-F20 sensor shows the highest CO2 gas sensing response of 71% and 15% at 1500 ppm in N-2 (37% RH) and air environment (68% RH), respectively. In addition, the sensor shows a good repeatability performance with the sensing and recovery time of about 4 min when exposed to 750 and 769 ppm CO2 concentration. The repeatability performance was measured in air environment at 68% RH without external assisted recovery. This simple, room-temperature reduction process and sensing capability, low cost fabrication process of a graphene sensor could lead to the implementation of a practical indoor air quality monitor. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据