4.7 Article

Molecular imprinted polyacrylic acids based QCM sensor array for recognition of organic acids in body odor

期刊

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
卷 204, 期 -, 页码 74-87

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2014.07.098

关键词

Body odor; Organic acid; MIP; QCM; Pattern recognition

资金

  1. JSPS [25420409]
  2. [24.02367]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25420409, 12F02367] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In present research, a novel volatile acids imprinted 3-element quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) sensor array has been designed for the selective recognition of organic acids odor. The target organic acids have been previously assigned as significant biomarker in human body odor and human waste odor. This is also confirmed with solid phase micro-extraction gas chromatography-mass spectrometer (SPME-GC-MS) characterization of body odor samples in present study. Polyacrylic acid (PAA) polymer has been used to prepare three selective molecular imprinted polymers (MIPs). MIP films were coated on the surface of QCM electrodes. Performance of MIP based QCM sensor array has been studied by exposing different concentrations of propenoic acid, hexanoic acid, and octanoic acid in singly and their binary mixtures. The response time and recovery time were 5s and 14s, respectively for one of the MIP coated QCM sensor to a typical binary mixture of acids odor. Frequency shift of QCM due to odor molecules adsorption in thin layer of MIP was measured as sensor signal. Sensor signal response matrix has been analyzed with principal component analysis (PCA) and support vector machine (SVM) methods for the odor recognition. The acid odors were identified effectively in principal component (PC) space. SVM classifier results 70-76% recognition rate for three classes of binary odor. While excluding the binary mixture of propenoic acid and octanoic acid the average recognition rate approaches to 95% in 3-fold cross validation of SVM classifier. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据