4.7 Article

A nanostructured-nickel based interdigitated capacitive transducer for biosensor applications

期刊

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
卷 160, 期 1, 页码 891-898

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2011.08.078

关键词

Biosensor; Capacitive transducer; C-reactive protein (CRP); Cardiovascular diseases (CVD); Bovine serum albumin (BSA); Prostate specific antigen (PSA)

资金

  1. Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) [107E014]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents, for the first time, the development of a nickel-based, reliable alternative electrode for biosensor applications. The electrodes are formed of nanosized nickel patterned as interdigitated structure to form a capacitive biosensor platform. To test the sensing performance of new biosensing platform, we investigated cardiovascular risk marker (C-reactive protein - CRP) and to check the specificity of the bioassay bovine serum albumin (BSA) and prostate specific antigen (PSA) were employed as controls. The nickel-electrode surface was covalently functionalized and characterized by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR). The detection and quantification of CRP-antigen was performed by impediometric measurements. A detection model for the new biosensing platform was developed using the spectral impediometric responses and are matched with the specific antibody-antigen interaction-model, using the Cole-Cole model parameters. The results and analysis shown that the nanosized, nickel-based-electrode surface could be a good potential to be a cost effective alternative to the conventional gold electrodes with a comparable sensing performance, as shown for CRP, with a detection limit of 1-250 ng/ml. Furthermore, nano-sized nickel-based capacitive electrodes were fabricated using integrated circuit (IC) fabrication processes, providing compatibility for the integration of electronic circuits for single-chip and lab-on-chip biosensing applications. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据