4.7 Article

Improved enzyme immobilization for enhanced bioelectrocatalytic activity of glucose sensor

期刊

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
卷 136, 期 2, 页码 332-337

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2008.12.049

关键词

Glucose sensor; Glucose oxidase; MWNTs; ZnO particles; Synergic action

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [60672002]
  2. Shanghai Applied Material Foundation [06SA17]
  3. Shanghai Pujiang Project [06PJ14037]
  4. Shanghai Municipal Commission for Science and Technology [0752nm021]
  5. MOST [2006CB933000, 2007CB936000]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, we report the development of a highly sensitive and stable glucose sensor based on the synergetic effect of multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWNTs) and ZnO nanoparticles. Since the isoelectric point (IEP) of glucose oxidase (GOx) is significantly different from that of ZnO nanoparticles, GOx was electrostatically bound to ZnO nanoparticles decorated onto a negatively charged MWNTs layer at the electrode surface via VLS growth. A cationic polydiallyldimethylammonium chloride (PDDA) layer was further coated onto the GOx-contained ZnO nanoparticle layer to prevent the leakage of GOx. This unique multi-layer structure (PDDA/GOx/ZnO/MWNTs) provided a favorable microenvironment to maintain the bioactivity of GOx, which led to rapid amperometric response toward glucose. By loading 0.5-U GOx at the sensor surface, we obtained a wide linear response range of 0.1-16mM for this sensor. High sensitivity of 50.2 mA cm(-2) M-1 was obtained with increased loading of GOx (2.0U), leading to an even lower detection limit of 250 nM. This nanomaterials-based glucose sensor was highly sensitive and showed favorable stability over a relatively long-term storage (160 days). Importantly, we challenged our sensor with 100 human blood serum samples, and obtained consistent results with the classic spectrometric assay (correlation coefficient, 0.997). (c) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据