4.7 Article

Synthesis and immobilization of thiolated pyrrolidinyl peptide nucleic acids on gold-coated piezoelectric quartz crystals for the detection of DNA hybridization

期刊

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
卷 137, 期 1, 页码 215-221

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2008.11.038

关键词

Peptide nucleic acid; DNA; QCM; Self-assembled monolayer; Biosensor; Hybridization

资金

  1. Ratchadapiseksompoj Endowment Fund
  2. National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT)
  3. Nanopolymer Project [GOR-SOR-SOR 52/2547, 12/2548]
  4. National Nanotechnology Center [NN-B-22-b6-10-49-17]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two novel thiolated pyrrolidinyl peptide nucleic acids (HS-PNA) carrying D-prolyl-2-aminocyclopentane-carboxylic acid (ACPC) backbones were synthesized and directly immobilized on gold-coated quartz crystals by self-assembled monolayer (SAM) formation (via S atom linkage) for the detection of DNA hybridization. The amount of immobilized HS-PNA was determined by quartz crystal microbalance (QCM), whilst the surface functionality and wettability of the gold surfaces before and after immobilization of the HS-PNA were characterized by reflection absorption infrared spectroscopy (RAIRS) and water contact angle analysis, respectively. Three different procedures for immobilization of HS-PNA were investigated; (I) HS-PNA without blocking thiol, (II) HS-PNA with subsequent blocking thiol and (III) co-immobilization with mixed HS-PNA and blocking thiol. The amount of immobilized HS-PNA on the gold electrode increased asymptotically with the HS-PNA concentration. The sequential blocking step procedure II) was critical to the success of subsequent DNA hybridization. For hybridization, 0.5 mN phosphate buffer at pH 7.0 with no added NaCl Was found to be optimal. Under these conditions, discrimination between complementary and single or multiple base mismatched DNA targets was achieved Using a combination of pyrrolidinyl HS-PNA with QCM. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据