4.7 Article

Optical sensors for bond-slip characterization and monitoring of RC structures

期刊

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS A-PHYSICAL
卷 280, 期 -, 页码 332-339

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.sna.2018.07.042

关键词

Bond-slip; Optical fiber sensor; FBG; RC structures; Pull-out test

资金

  1. FCT/MEC
  2. FEDER - PT2020 partnership [UID/CTM/50025/2013, UID/EEA/50008/2013, POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007457]
  3. PREDICT scientific action (FCT, IT-LA)
  4. FCT [SFRH/BPD/109458/2015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bond-slip is an important interaction between steel and concrete in reinforced concrete (RC) structures and other civil engineering constructions. It is essential to understand and to characterize, at local level, this stress transference mechanism. In particular its behavior for monotonic and cyclic demands, the parameters that influence this mechanism, and how it is affected by different deterioration factors. Therefore, characterizing and monitoring the bond-slip mechanism is essential for the safety assessment of RC structures, more specifically determining the reinforcing bars slippage inside the concrete, and therefore the stress and strain distribution in RC members. In this work, two optical fiber sensors are presented, based on silica and polymer fiber Bragg gratings (FBGs), which were implanted inside a concrete block specimen and subjected to a pull-out test. After 6 days of curing, the pull-out test was recorded and the displacement incurred during the test was also monitored with a traditional electric sensor; for comparison with the data acquired with the two optical sensors. The results obtained confirm the viability and advantages of the optical sensors, evidenced by their higher resolution and far lower dimensions (allowing them to be embedded into the concrete) when compared with their electronic counterparts. The straightforward implementation and use of the optical sensors show very promising results when used in civil engineering structures. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据