4.7 Article

Magnetite-Amyloid-β deteriorates activity and functional organization in an in vitro model for Alzheimer's disease

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 5, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/srep17261

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion (Spain) [FIS2011-28820-C02-01, FIS2013-41144-P]
  2. Generalitat de Catalunya [2009-SGR-14, 2014-SGR-878]
  3. VI National RDi Plan
  4. Iniciativa Ingenio 2010
  5. Consolider Program
  6. Instituto de Salud Carlos III
  7. Commission for Universities and Research of Department of Innovation, Universities
  8. Enterprise of the Generalitat de Catalunya [2014-SGR-1442]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The understanding of the key mechanisms behind human brain deterioration in Alzheimer' disease (AD) is a highly active field of research. The most widespread hypothesis considers a cascade of events initiated by amyloid-beta peptide fibrils that ultimately lead to the formation of the lethal amyloid plaques. Recent studies have shown that other agents, in particular magnetite, can also play a pivotal role. To shed light on the action of magnetite and amyloid-beta in the deterioration of neuronal circuits, we investigated their capacity to alter spontaneous activity patterns in cultured neuronal networks. Using a versatile experimental platform that allows the parallel monitoring of several cultures, the activity in controls was compared with the one in cultures dosed with magnetite, amyloid-beta and magnetite-amyloid-beta complex. A prominent degradation in spontaneous activity was observed solely when amyloid-beta and magnetite acted together. Our work suggests that magnetite nanoparticles have a more prominent role in AD than previously thought, and may bring new insights in the understanding of the damaging action of magnetite-amyloid-beta complex. Our experimental system also offers new interesting perspectives to explore key biochemical players in neurological disorders through a controlled, model system manner.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据