4.7 Article

Knockdown of the partner protein OsNAR2.1 for high-affinity nitrate transport represses lateral root formation in a nitrate-dependent manner

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 5, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/srep18192

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2011CB100302]
  2. National Nature Science Foundation of China [31071846, 31172022, 31372122, 31471936]
  3. Innovative Research Team Development Plan of the Ministry of Education of China [IRT1256]
  4. 111 Project [12009]
  5. PAPD in Jiangsu Province of China
  6. China Scholarship Council (CSC)
  7. Innovative Plan of Jiangsu Province of China [CXLX13_280, 568]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The morphological plasticity of root systems is critical for plant survival, and understanding the mechanisms underlying root adaptation to nitrogen (N) fluctuation is critical for sustainable agriculture; however, the molecular mechanism of N-dependent root growth in rice remains unclear. This study aimed to identify the role of the complementary high-affinity NO3- transport protein OsNAR2.1 in NO3- -regulated rice root growth. Comparisons with wild-type (WT) plants showed that knockdown of OsNAR2.1 inhibited lateral root (LR) formation under low NO3- concentrations, but not under low NH4+ concentrations. N-15-labelling NO3- supplies (provided at concentrations of 0-10 mM) demonstrated that (i) defects in LR formation in mutants subjected to low external NO3- concentrations resulted from impaired NO3- uptake, and (ii) the mutants had significantly fewer LRs than the WT plants when root N contents were similar between genotypes. LR formation in osnar2.1 mutants was less sensitive to localised NO3- supply than LR formation in WT plants, suggesting that OsNAR2.1 may be involved in a NO3--signalling pathway that controls LR formation. Knockdown of OsNAR2.1 inhibited LR formation by decreasing auxin transport from shoots to roots. Thus, OsNAR2.1 probably functions in both NO3 uptake and NO3--signalling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据