4.7 Article

A wafer-scale etching technique for high aspect ratio implantable MEMS structures

期刊

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS A-PHYSICAL
卷 162, 期 1, 页码 130-136

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.sna.2010.06.011

关键词

Utah electrode array (UEA); Neural interface; HF-HNO3 wet etching; High aspect ratio; Microelectrodes

资金

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [HHSN265200423621C] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microsystem technology is well suited to batch fabricate microelectrode arrays, such as the Utah electrode array (UEA), intended for recording and stimulating neural tissue. Fabrication of the UEA is primarily based on the use of dicing and wet etching to achieve high aspect ratio (15:1) penetrating electrodes. An important step in the array fabrication is the etching of electrodes to produce needle-shape electrodes with sharp tips. Traditional etching processes are performed on a single array, and the etching conditions are not optimized. As a result, the process leads to variable geometries of electrodes within an array. Furthermore, the process is not only time consuming but also labor-intensive.This report presents a wafer-scale etching method for the UEA. The method offers several advantages, such as substantial reduction in the processing time, higher throughput and lower cost. More importantly, the method increases the geometrical uniformity from electrode to electrode within an array (1.5 +/- 0.5% non-uniformity), and from array to array within a wafer (2 +/- 0.3% non-uniformity). Also, the etching rate of silicon columns, produced by dicing, are studied as a function of temperature, etching time and stirring rate in a nitric acid rich HF-HNO3 solution. These parameters were found to be related to the etching rates over the ranges studied and more importantly affect the uniformity of the etched silicon columns. An optimum etching condition was established to achieve uniform shape electrode arrays on wafer-scale. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据