4.7 Article

A novel approach of high speed scratching on silicon wafers at nanoscale depths of cut

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 5, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/srep16395

关键词

-

资金

  1. Excellent Young Scientists Fund of NSFC [51422502]
  2. Integrated Program for Major Research Plan of NSFC [91323302]
  3. Science Fund for Creative Research Groups of NSFC [51321004]
  4. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-13-0086]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [DUT14YQ215]
  6. Tribology Science Fund of State Key Laboratory of Tribology [SKLTKF14A03]
  7. Tsinghua University
  8. Science Fund of the State Key Laboratory of Metastable Materials Science and Technology [201501]
  9. Yanshan University
  10. Xinghai Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars at Dalian University of Technology
  11. Outstanding Creation Talents Cloud Project of Changzhou City [CQ20140008]
  12. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20151190]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a novel approach of high speed scratching is carried out on silicon (Si) wafers at nanoscale depths of cut to investigate the fundamental mechanisms in wafering of solar cells. The scratching is conducted on a Si wafer of 150 mm diameter with an ultraprecision grinder at a speed of 8.4 to 15 m/s. Single-point diamonds of a tip radius of 174, 324, and 786 nm, respectively, are used in the study. The study finds that at the onset of chip formation, an amorphous layer is formed at the topmost of the residual scratch, followed by the pristine crystalline lattice beneath. This is different from the previous findings in low speed scratching and high speed grinding, in which there is an amorphous layer at the top and a damaged layer underneath. The final width and depth of the residual scratch at the onset of chip formation measured vary from 288 to 316 nm, and from 49 to 62 nm, respectively. High pressure phases are absent from the scratch at the onset of either chip or crack formation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据