4.3 Review

The Role of Complement in Membranous Nephropathy

期刊

SEMINARS IN NEPHROLOGY
卷 33, 期 6, 页码 531-542

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2013.08.004

关键词

Membranous nephropathy; phospholipase A(2) receptor; PLA(2)R; complement; IgG4

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [R01 DK090029, T32 DK07053-37]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Membranous nephropathy (MN) describes a histopathologic pattern of injury marked by glomerular subepithelial immune deposits and collectively represents one of the most common causes of adult nephrotic syndrome. Studies in Heymann nephritis, an experimental model of MN, have established a paradigm in which these deposits locally activate complement to cause podocyte injury, culminating in cytoskeletal reorganization, loss of slit diaphragms, and proteinuria. There is much circumstantial evidence for a prominent role of complement in human MN because C3 and C5b-9 are found consistently within immune deposits. Secondary MN often shows the additional presence of C1q, implicating the classic pathway of complement activation. Primary MN, however, is IgG4-predominant and IgG4 is considered incapable of binding C1q and activating the complement pathway. Recent studies have identified the M-type phospholipase A(2) receptor (PLA(2)R) as the major target antigen in primary MN. Early evidence hints that IgG4 anti-PLA(2)R autoantibodies can bind mannan-binding lectin and activate the lectin complement pathway. The identification of anti-PLA(2)R antibodies as likely participants in the pathogenesis of disease will allow focused investigation into the role of complement in MN. Definitive therapy for MN is immunosuppression, although future therapeutic agents that specifically target complement activation may represent an effective temporizing measure to forestall further glomerular injury. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据