4.3 Review

Epithelial-Mesenchymal Interactions in Biliary Diseases

期刊

SEMINARS IN LIVER DISEASE
卷 31, 期 1, 页码 11-32

出版社

THIEME MEDICAL PUBL INC
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1272832

关键词

Cholangiopathies; cholangiocytes; ductular reaction; myofibroblasts; endothelial cells

资金

  1. Telethon [GGP09189]
  2. Progetto di Ricerca Ateneo [CPDA083217]
  3. Associazione Scientifica Gastroenterologica di Treviso (ASGET, associazione di promozione sociale senza scopo di lucro)
  4. Federazione Amici Di Epatologia (FADE)
  5. NIH [DK079005]
  6. Yale University Liver Center [NIH DK34989]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In most cholangiopathies, liver diseases of different etiologies in which the biliary epithelium is the primary target in the pathogenic sequence, the central mechanism involves inflammation. Inflammation, characterized by pleomorphic peri-biliary infiltrate containing fibroblasts, macrophages, lymphocytes, as well as endothelial cells and pericytes, is associated to the emergence of reactive cholangiocytes. These biliary cells do not possess bile secretory functions, are in contiguity with terminal cholangioles, and are of a less-differentiated phenotype. They have acquired several mesenchymal properties, including motility and ability to secrete a vast number of proinflammatory chemo/cytokines and growth factors along with de novo expression of a rich receptor machinery. These functional properties enable reactive cholangiocytes to establish intimate contacts and to mutually exchange a variety of paracrine signals with the different mesenchymal cell types populating the portal infiltrate. The extensive crosstalk between the epithelial and mesenchymal compartments is the driver of liver repair mechanisms in cholangiopathies, ultimately evolving toward portal fibrosis. Herein, the authors first review the properties of the different cell types involved in their interaction, and then analyze the underlying molecular mechanisms as they relate to liver repair in cholangiopathies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据