4.3 Review

The Spectrum of Liver Diseases Related to ABCB4 Gene Mutations: Pathophysiology and Clinical Aspects

期刊

SEMINARS IN LIVER DISEASE
卷 30, 期 2, 页码 134-146

出版社

THIEME MEDICAL PUBL INC
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1253223

关键词

Multidrug resistance 3; ABCB4; progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 3; cholesterol gallstone; cholestasis of pregnancy; biliary cirrhosis; low phospholipid associated cholelithiasis; transient neonatal cholestasis; drug-induced cholestasis; ursodeoxycholic acid; adult ductopenia

资金

  1. Assistance Publique -Hopitaux de Paris and Ministere de la Sante (Paris, France) [2002/2003, 2004/2005, 2005/2006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Class III multidrug resistance P-glycoproteins, Mdr2 in mice and MDR3 in human, are canalicular phospholipid translocators involved in biliary phospholipid (phosphatidylcholine) excretion. The role of an ABCB4 gene defect in liver disease has been initially proven in a subtype of progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis called PFIC3, a severe pediatric liver disease that may require liver transplantation. Several ABCB4 mutations have been identified in children with PFIC3 and are associated with low level of phospholipids in bile leading to a high biliary cholesterol saturation index. ABCB4 mutations are associated with loss of canalicular MDR3 protein and /or loss of protein function. There is evidence that a biallelic or monoallelic ABCB4 defect causes or predisposes to several human liver diseases (PFIC3, low phospholipid associated cholelithiasis syndrome, intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, drug-induced liver injury, transient neonatal cholestasis, adult biliary fibrosis, or cirrhosis). Most patients with MDR3 deficiency have a favorable outcome with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) therapy, but some PFIC3 patients who do not respond to UDCA treatment still require liver transplantation. The latter should be good candidates for a targeted pharmacologic approach and/or to cell therapy in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据