4.5 Review

Refractory celiac disease: from bench to bedside

期刊

SEMINARS IN IMMUNOPATHOLOGY
卷 34, 期 4, 页码 601-613

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00281-012-0322-z

关键词

Celiac disease; Intraepithelial lymphocytes; Colllagenous sprue; Enteropathy-type-associated lymphoma; Gluten

资金

  1. INSERM
  2. Ligue Contre le Cancer
  3. Fondation Pour la Recherche Medicale
  4. Agence Nationale pour la Recherche
  5. Association pour la Recherche contre le Cancer
  6. Association francaise des Patients Intolerants au Gluten
  7. Fondation Princesse Grace

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Refractory celiac disease is defined by the persistence of symptoms of malnutrition and intestinal villous atrophy for more than 6-12 months despite strict gluten-free diet in celiac patients. Diagnosis of this rare condition is made after excluding other causes of chronic small intestinal inflammation and villous atrophy and inadvertent intake of gluten. Over the past 15 years, multidisciplinary approaches have been developed to assess the mechanism of resistance to the diet, and two distinct entities have been delineated. Type II refractory celiac disease (RCD) can be defined as a low-grade intraepithelial lymphoma. RCD II is characterised by a massive accumulation of abnormal IEL that display an aberrant hybrid NK/T cell phenotype, contain clonal T cell rearrangement(s) and can mediate a cytolytic attack of the gut epithelium. This condition has a severe prognosis, largely due to the frequent transformation of RCDII IEL into overt aggressive enteropathy-type-associated T cell lymphoma. In contrast, in type I RCD, intestinal lymphocytes have a normal phenotype, and this generally milder condition remains often difficult to differentiate from uncomplicated CD except for the resistance to gluten-free diet (GFD). Several mechanisms may underlie resistance to gluten. Herein, we review the distinctive characteristics of RCD I and RCD II, the mechanisms underlying the onset of resistance to GFD, the risk of developing high grade lymphoma and possible clues to improve their treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据