4.5 Review

Food-induced anaphylaxis: mast cells as modulators of anaphylactic severity

期刊

SEMINARS IN IMMUNOPATHOLOGY
卷 34, 期 5, 页码 643-653

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00281-012-0320-1

关键词

Mast cells; Anaphylaxis; Systemic; Intestinal; Mouse

资金

  1. NIH [R01AI073553-01, NIH P30DK078392]
  2. VA Merit Award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A food-induced anaphylactic reaction can occur within seconds to a few hours following exposure to the causal food allergen and often affects multiple organ systems including gastrointestinal, cutaneous, respiratory, and cardiovascular. A conundrum in the allergy field is that consumption of the same allergen can cause reactions of vastly different severity in separate individuals; one patient may experience a mild non-life-threatening reaction characterized by pruritis of lips or urticaria whereas another may experience a life-threatening reaction that involves respiratory and cardiovascular compromise leading to loss of consciousness and sometimes death. While there are tests available to determine the predictive risk value of a positive food challenge test or clinical reactivity, there is currently no reliable method to distinguish between individuals who are at risk of mild non-life-threatening versus life-threatening reaction. Recent research has significantly advanced our understanding of the involvement of immune pathways in the effector phase of food-induced anaphylaxis; a void remains regarding our understanding of the contribution of these pathways to severity of disease. In this review, we discuss mild non-life-threatening versus life-threatening food-induced anaphylaxis and factors (co-morbidities and immune activation) that predispose individuals to more severe disease. Furthermore, we summarize recent advancements in our understanding of the involvement of underlying immune pathways in systemic and food-induced anaphylaxis in mouse systems and discuss how these pathways may contribute to more severe disease phenotype.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据