4.5 Review

New tricks from an old dog: Mitochondrial redox signaling in cellular inflammation

期刊

SEMINARS IN IMMUNOLOGY
卷 24, 期 6, 页码 384-392

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.smim.2013.01.002

关键词

Reactive oxygen species; Mitochondria; Inflammation; Metabolism; Signaling

资金

  1. Medical Research Council [MC_U105663142] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. MRC [MC_U105663142] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Intramural NIH HHS [Z01 AR041175-01] Funding Source: Medline
  4. Medical Research Council [MC_U105663142] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as superoxide (O-2(-)) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) have long been implicated as pro-inflammatory, yet the sources of ROS and the molecular mechanisms by which they enhance inflammation have been less clear. Recent advances in the understanding of the molecular basis of inflammation mediated by the innate immune system have allowed these issues to be revisited. Although the Nox2 NADPH oxidases generate the bulk of ROS for antimicrobial host defense, recent studies have found that NADPH oxidase-dependent ROS production can actually dampen macrophage inflammatory responses to sterile pro-inflammatory stimuli. Instead, production of mitochondrial ROS has emerged as an important factor in both host defense and sterile inflammation. Excess mitochondrial ROS can be generated by either damage to the respiratory chain or by alterations of mitochondrial function such as those that increase membrane potential and reduce respiratory electron carriers. In autoinflammatory diseases, where key components of innate immune responses are activated by genetic mutations or environmental stimuli, inflammation has been found to be particularly sensitive to inhibition of mitochondrial ROS production. These findings have highlighted mitochondrial ROS as a novel generator of pro-inflammatory ROS and a potential therapeutic target in inflammatory diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据