4.3 Article

Relativistic model of anisotropic charged fluid sphere in general relativity

期刊

ASTROPHYSICS AND SPACE SCIENCE
卷 361, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10509-015-2635-6

关键词

General relativity; Exact solution; Curvature coordinates; Anisotropic fluid sphere; Einstein-Maxwell; Reissner-Nordstrom

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this present paper, we present a class of static, spherically symmetric charged anisotropic fluid models of super dense stars in isotropic coordinates by considering a particular type of metric potential, a specific choice of electric field intensity E and pressure anisotropy factor Delta which involve parameters K (charge) and alpha (anisotropy) respectively. The solutions so obtained are utilized to construct the models for super-dense stars like neutron stars and strange quark stars. Our solutions are well behaved within the following ranges of different constant parameters. In the absence of pressure anisotropy and charge present model reduces to the isotropic model Pant et al. (Astrophys. Space Sci. 330: 353-359, 2010). Our solution is well behaved in all respects for all values of X lying in the range 0 < X <= 0.18, a lying in the range 0 <= alpha <= 6.6, K lying in the range 0 < K <= 6.6 and Schwarzschild compactness parameter u lying in the range 0 < u <= 0.38. Since our solution is well behaved for a wide ranges of the parameters, we can model many different types of ultra-cold compact stars like quark stars and neutron stars. We have shown that corresponding to X = 0.088, alpha = 0.6 and K = 4.3 for which u = 0.2054 and by assuming surface density rho(b) = 4.6888 x 10(14) g/cm(3) the mass and radius are found to be 1.51 M-circle minus and 10.90 km respectively. Assuming surface density rho(b) = 2 x 10(14) g/cm(3) the mass and radius for a neutron star candidate are found to be 2.313 M-circle minus and 16.690 km respectively. Hence we obtain masses and radii that fall in the range of what is generally expected for quark stars and neutron stars.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据