4.6 Review

Electrical fields in wound healing-An overriding signal that directs cell migration

期刊

SEMINARS IN CELL & DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY
卷 20, 期 6, 页码 674-682

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2008.12.009

关键词

Wound healing; Electric fields; Cell migration; Guidance cue; Hierarchical signaling; Overriding guidance; Transepithelial potential difference

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust
  2. Mearns' Trust
  3. British Heart Foundation
  4. Royal Society (London)
  5. Royal Society of Edinburgh
  6. UC Davis Dermatology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Injury that disrupts an epithelial layer instantaneously generates endogenous electric fields (EFs), which were detected at human skin wounds over 150 years ago. Recent researches combining molecular, genetic and imaging techniques have provided significant insights into cellular and molecular responses to this unconventional signal. One unexpected finding is that the EFs play an overriding guidance role in directing cell migration in epithelialwound healing. In experimental models where other directional cues (e. g., contact inhibition release, population pressure etc.) are present, electric fields of physiological strength override them and direct cell migration. The electrotaxis or galvanotaxis is mediated by polarized activation of multiple signaling pathways that include PI3 kinases/Pten, membrane growth factor receptors and integrins. Genetic manipulation of PI3 kinase/Pten (Phosphoinositide 3-kinases/phosphatase and tensin homolog) and integrin beta 4 demonstrated the importance of those molecules. The electric fields are therefore a fundamental signal that directs cell migration in wound healing. One of the most challenging question is: How do cells sense the very weak electric signals? Clinically, it is highly desirable to develop practical and reliable technologies for wound healing management exploiting the electric signaling. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据