4.4 Review

Early predictors of outcomes in pediatric lupus nephritis: Focus on proliferative lesions

期刊

SEMINARS IN ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM
卷 43, 期 4, 页码 513-520

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2013.07.005

关键词

Lupus nephritis; Children; Outcomes; Predictors

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: Studies regarding the clinical features and outcomes of pediatric lupus nephritis are limited, and risk factors of poor outcome in the more severe form of renal involvement, proliferative lupus nephritis (PLN), are poorly understood. This study analyzed the data from a large prospective cohort of childhood systemic lupus erythematosus to determine such risk factors. Methods: Subjects younger than 18 years at onset with biopsy-proven lupus nephritis were enrolled. Data on baseline presentations and laboratory values, response to treatment, and outcomes were collected. Primary outcome measures were death or end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Survival analysis was done and predictors were approached. Results: One hundred four patients with mean age of 12.4 +/- 2.5 years (range, 4.0-17.2 years) and the female-to-male ratio of 5.94:1 were included. Among them, 81 patients had PLN and 23 had non-proliferative lupus nephritis. Those with PLN had significantly lower GFR, more proteinuria, more urine sediment, more hypertension, and poor early response to treatment (within 6 months). There was no significant difference in extra-renal manifestations. All poor outcomes happened in the PLN group. The prognostic factors were high baseline SLEDAI-2k >20 (HR, 6.76; p = 0.002), baseline GFR <60 ml/min/m(2) (HR, 3.88; p = 0.022), and early responder (HR, 0.19; p = 0.013). Conclusions: Patients with pediatric lupus nephritis and high risk factor can be identified early by concomitantly considering their baseline features and early response, which provides a novel hint in decision for management decisions. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据