4.4 Review

Inverse Relationship Between Preoperative Radiographic Severity and Postoperative Pain in Patients with Osteoarthritis who Have Undergone Total Joint Arthroplasty

期刊

SEMINARS IN ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM
卷 41, 期 4, 页码 568-575

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2011.07.002

关键词

arthroplasty; osteoarthritis; pain; etiology; radiographic severity; WOMAC

资金

  1. EC [200800 TREAT-OA]
  2. AstraZeneca UK

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: To determine cross-sectionally the influence of risk factors on chronic pain following total joint replacement (TJR) of the knee (TKR) or the hip (THR). Methods: Eight hundred sixty post-TKR and 928 post-THR patients were studied. Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index pain scores taken on average 3.2 years postsurgery were correlated to preoperative radiographic severity measured by Kellgren-Lawrence grade (K/L) grade for the knee, Croft grade, and minimum joint space width (minJSW) for the hip and presence of comorbidities. Results: Known risk factors were able to explain less than 20% of the variance in pain scores post-TJR. The presence of chronic widespread pain determined a higher risk of high pain in both TKR cases (odds ratio (OR) = 3.15 95 %CI 1.86-5.30) and THR cases (OR = 5.02 95%CI 2.76-9.14). Other risk factors common to both TKR and THR pain postsurgery were the presence of depression, higher body mass index, younger age, and female gender. Interestingly, low radiographic grade at the index joint presurgery (defined as tibiofemoral K/L <3 for the knee and minJSW >2 mm for the hip) resulted in a significantly increased risk of high pain post-TJR (OR = 1.56; 95%CI 1.04-2.36). Conclusions: The risk factors contributing to chronic pain post-TJR remain mostly unknown. Individuals with lower preoperative radiographic OA severity undergoing TJR are more likely to experience high pain post-TJR. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Semin Arthritis Rheum 41:568-575

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据