4.4 Review

Methods of Formal Consensus in Classification/Diagnostic Criteria and Guideline Development

期刊

SEMINARS IN ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM
卷 41, 期 2, 页码 95-105

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2010.12.001

关键词

guideline criteria; formal consensus methods; Delphi method; nominal group technique; RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method; National Institutes of Health consensus development; conference; GRADE; diagnostic criteria

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [NIAMS K23 AR053858-04]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Guidelines or diagnostic criteria in clinical practice assist physicians in their clinical decision-making and improve health outcomes for patients. Diagnostic and classification criteria should be based on evidence from rigorously conducted controlled studies. Formal group consensus methods have been developed to organize subjective judgments and to synthesize them with the available evidence. This review discusses 4 types of formal consensus methods used in the health field and their applications in rheumatology: the Delphi method, Nominal Group Technique, RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method, and National Institutes of Health consensus development conference. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Semin Arthritis Rheum 41:95-105

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据