4.7 Article

Proteasome Accessory Factor C (pafC) Is a novel gene Involved in Mycobacterium Intrinsic Resistance to broad-spectrum antibiotics - Fluoroquinolones

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 5, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/srep11910

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation [81371851, 81071316, 81271882, 81301394]
  2. New Century Excellent Talents in Universities [NCET-11-0703]
  3. National Megaprojects for Key Infectious Diseases [2008ZX10003-006]
  4. Southwest University [kb2010017, ky2011003]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [XDJK2011D006, XDJK2012D011, XDJK2012D007, XDJK2013D003, XDJK2014D040]
  6. Graduate research and innovation project of graduate in Chongqing [CYS14044]
  7. Chongqing Municipal Committee of Education [YJG123104]
  8. [2013JY201]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Antibiotics resistance poses catastrophic threat to global public health. Novel insights into the underlying mechanisms of action will inspire better measures to control drug resistance. Fluoroquinolones are potent and widely prescribed broad-spectrum antibiotics. Bacterial protein degradation pathways represent novel druggable target for the development of new classes of antibiotics. Mycobacteria proteasome accessory factor C (pafC), a component of bacterial proteasome, is involved in fluoroquinolones resistance. PafC deletion mutants are hypersensitive to fluoroquinolones, including moxifloxacin, norfloxacin, ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, but not to other antibiotics such as isoniazid, rifampicin, spectinomycin, chloramphenicol, capreomycin. This phenotype can be restored by complementation. The pafC mutant is hypersensitive to H2O2 exposure. The iron chelator (bipyridyl) and a hydroxyl radical scavenger (thiourea) can abolish the difference. The finding that pafC is a novel intrinsic selective resistance gene provided new evidence for the bacterial protein degradation pathway as druggable target for the development of new class of antibiotics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据